WhatsApp)
Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd v Regional Director:Free State Department of Water Affairs and Others (971/12) [2013] ZASCA 206; [2014] 1 All SA 553 (SCA); 2014 (3) SA 149 (SCA) (4 December 2013) Reward Ventures 01 CC v Walker and Another (946/2012) [2013] ZASCA 207 (5 December 2013)
David Netherway is a mining engineer with over 40 years of experience in the mining industry. He was involved in the construction and development of the New Liberty, Iduapriem, Siguiri, Samira Hill and Kiniero gold mines in West Africa and has mining experience in Africa, Australia, China, Canada, India and the Former Soviet Union.
JUDGMENT Pratt, J. 1. The first and the second plaintiffs who are shareholders in the Tata Industrial Bank, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act VII of 1913, file this suit against the company by their directors for a declaration that the proceedings of a general meeting held on May 1, 1923, were improperly conducted and that certain appointments made at that .
Nov 23, 2012· [Salisbury Gold Mining Co. v. Hathorn, (1897)]. 5. When in an ordinary meeting a poll is demanded on a motion to adjourn and such poll cannot be taken forthwith, the chairman has power to suspend the meeting with a view to its continuance at a later date after the result of the poll is known. [Jackson v. Hamlyn, (1953)]. 6.
Get free access to the complete judgment in SALISBURY LAND IMPROVEMENT CO. v. COM''LTH on CaseMine.
a. 1, 8 ML/day of water found underground at Harmony #7 shaft is to be collected and removed to surface by Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited, reused by Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited in a legal and approved manner in terms of Chapter 4 of the National Water Act 36 of 1998, and the cost for such collection, removal and reuse is to be ...
Judgments of the Supreme Court of the, in the cases of v. the Salisbury GoldMining Company and Andrew v. the Robinson GoldMining Company delivered 1st February, 1894 Responsibility: revised by the chief justice.
A particularly notorious case was that of the Ayrshire mine in Southern Rhodesia''s Lomagundi district. Touted in its heyday as the richest gold prospect in the entire southern half of the continent, the Ayrshire''s corporate existence was characterized by company .
Standard Life Assurance Co. v. Assessor of Area 1—Capital: 1997 CanLII 4012 (BC CA) Standard Life Assurance Co. v. ParcIX Ltd. 1991 CanLII 7350 (ON SC) Standard Life Assurance Co. v. Royal Oak Holdings Ltd. 2005 BCSC 525 Standard Manufacturing Co. v. Baird
Salisbury Gold Mining Company Limited v K. H. Hathorn and others (Natal) [1897] UKPC 9 (10 March 1897) Salisbury House Estate, Ltd v Fry (H M Inspector of Taxes) ; (2) City of London Real Property Company, Ltd v Jones (H M Inspector of Taxes) [1930] UKHL TC_15_266 (4 .
gold plants in combination with one or other frothers. When selectivity is required or, in the case of copper–gold ores, where a copper concentrate is sold to a smelter, a weaker frother such as methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) is preferred.
Worcester, Western Cape Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Worcester is a City in the Western Cape, South Africa, Fischer of Tulbagh, to find a location to establish a new deputy magisterial seat during 1818, The company developed a gold mine at Barberton which eventually closed down, with.
that tribunal: see Salisbury Gold Mining Company v Hathorn [1897] AC 268, 274. In relation to appeals to the High Court from interlocutory judgments of State Supreme Courts, leave was originally required by s 35(1)(a) of the Judiciary Act 1903, but special leave might be given if .
ATWOOL v. MERRYWEATHER Company suitsS uits to recover money/damages to the company. ... SALISBURY GOLD KINING CO. v. HATHORN; FOULSHAM v. PICKLES; ... RE URUGUAY CENTRAL RAILWAY CO. (1879) RE NEW CHILE GOLD MINING CO. DAVEY CO. v. WILLIAMSON SONS; THE BUSOGA MILLERS INDUSTRIES LTD v. PURSHOTTAM ...
Salisbury Gold Mining Co. v. Hathorn, (1897) AC 268. In view of the recent trend of not prescribing qualification shares for Directors and generally the Chairman of the Board of Directors presides over General Meetings, a nonmember Chairman can preside over General Meetings of companies.
SALISBURY GOLD KINING CO. v. HATHORN company meetings. Posted by DENIS MARINGO at 11:10 AM. Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. No comments: Post a Comment. Newer Post Older Post Home. Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) Search This Blog.
Xinhai provides mineral processing technology, equipment manufacture and onestop service for mineral processing plant, which solve many problems for mine investors. Xinhai equipment mainly include: ball mills, flotation, thickeners, and so on.
In Salisbury Gold Mining Co. Limited v Hathorn(1897) AC 268, the articles provided only that the Chairman could adjourn with the consent of the meeting and did not additionally require the Chairman to adjourn if so directed by the meeting; it was thus held that the Chairman was not bound to adjourn even if the majority of members present wanted ...
This is illustrated by Sixth West Kent Mutual Building Society v Shove 2 and it from LAWS 2101 at The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Nkala and Others v Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited and Others (48226/12, 31324/12, 31326/12, 31327/12, 48226/12, 08108/13) [2016] ZAGPJHC 97; [2016] 3 All SA 233 (GJ) ; 2016 (7) BCLR 881 (GJ); 2016 (5) SA 240 (GJ) (13 May 2016) ... HARMONY GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITED..... First Respondent (Registration number M1950/038232/06 ... In the case ...
that tribunal: see Salisbury Gold Mining Company v Hathorn [1897] AC 268, 274. In relation to appeals to the High Court from interlocutory judgments of State Supreme Courts, leave was originally required by s 35(1)(a) of the Judiciary Act 1903, but special leave might be given if the High Court thought fit to grant it: s 35(1)(b).
Western Counties Steam Bakeries Milling Co, Re; Salisbury Gold Mining Co Ltd v Hathorn; Donnison v Employers'' Accident Live Stock Insurance Co; Bell v Balls; White v Morris, Little Son Ltd; Bank of Victoria v Robertson; Martin v Hooper; New Moss Colliery Company v Manchester, Sheffield Lincolnshire Railway Company; Royal Albert Hall ...
such as clauses 10 and 75 giving a company certain rights as against from LAW LW3902 at City University of Hong Kong
Dengetenge Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Southern Sphere Mining and Development Company Ltd others (619/12) [2013] ZASCA 5 (11 March 2013) Failure to comply with rules of court – appeal lapsing – application for condonation – factors to be considered – cumulative effect of such factors – .
WhatsApp)